Frontier in Medical & Health Research
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DERADICALIZATION STRATEGIES: PAKISTAN AND SAUDI ARABIA
pdf

Keywords

Counter-violent extremism
Deradicalization
PRAC Model
Rehabilitation
Reintegration
Policy Recommendations

How to Cite

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DERADICALIZATION STRATEGIES: PAKISTAN AND SAUDI ARABIA. (2025). Frontier in Medical and Health Research, 3(2), 136-145. https://fmhr.org/index.php/fmhr/article/view/108

Abstract

The process of deradicalization is essential for countering violent extremism (CVE), as it facilitates the rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals whose  extremist ideologies have influenced. Various nations have adopted different approaches to address radicalization, with strategies tailored to their socio- political contexts. Pakistan primarily employs a militarized approach to combat extremism, whereas Saudi Arabia has developed a comprehensive framework known as the Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Aftercare (PRAC) model. This study critically examines the effectiveness of both strategies, identifying key strengths, limitations, and areas for improvement. By conducting a comparative analysis, this research highlights best practices that could enhance Pakistan’s CVE initiatives, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that integrates psychological, social, and religious interventions. The findings contribute to the broader discourse on counterterrorism and provide policy recommendations for developing sustainable and evidence-based deradicalization programs. 

pdf